ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PEGAWAI APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA BIDANG SUMBER DAYA AIR DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN TATA RUANG KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61167/amnesia.v4i3.338Keywords:
Performance Effectiveness, Culture Clash, Human Resource Management, Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK), Public ServiceAbstract
The injection of new state apparatus through the Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK) scheme is assumed to close the skill gap and enhance public sector performance. However, empirical reality indicates that the integration of such human resources frequently collides with established work cultures. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of competence adaptation, work culture clash, and the impact of internal regulations on the performance effectiveness of the apparatus in the Water Resources Division of the Public Works and Spatial Planning (PUTR) Agency of Indragiri Hilir Regency. Employing a qualitative method with a case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation studies, and were subsequently analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings reveal that the enhancement of human capital quality is not directly proportional to performance effectiveness due to a phenomenon of "performance compromise." Three main findings emerged: (1) a technical competence adaptation shock among new apparatus in the extreme peatland ecosystem; (2) a culture clash driven by the status quo resistance of senior civil servants, which restricts innovation; and (3) internal bureaucratic rigidity that hinders field execution. This study concludes that the linear assumption of Human Capital Theory in the public sector will not be optimal without managerial interventions, specifically cultural unfreezing and the debureaucratization of technical procedures.
References
PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, UNDANG.UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2023, no. 202875. 2023.
S. Deni, A. Deni, and T. Husein, “Navigating Meritocracy and Political Influence in Regional Bureaucratic Recruitment: Insights from Indonesia,” J. public policy Adm., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 214–223, 2025, doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20250904.11.
V. Ramli and I. Anwary, “Reforming the Bureaucratic Frontiers : An Analysis of Legal Implications , Concepts and Challenges for Non- Civil Servant Employees in Indonesia,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 102–114, 2025, doi: 10.59631/slr.v3i2.435.
L. Samsara, “Tantangan dalam pengembangan kompetensi pegawai pemerintah dengan perjanjian kerja: pemenuhan kesenjangan kompetensi seperti pegawai negeri sipil atau pengayaan kompetensi,” J. Kewidyaiswaraan, 2023, doi: 10.56971/jwi.v8i1.268.
F. B. Ibrahim and A. H. B. Jantan, “Challenges, barriers, and solutions in public-private partnerships (ppp): a comprehensive review,” Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., vol. 9, no. 10, p. e04830, 2024, doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i10.4830.
B. Amitha, T. Kasa, S. K. Jaiswal, A. K. Pandey, I. Goel, and P. Barsing, “Gaps in Governance and Execution: Ten Case Studies of Failed PPP’s in India,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.52761.
B. Wardiyanto, E. Setijaningrum, S. A. Samad, and A. H. Kandar, “Mending the mismatch of minds and mandates: reimagining competency-centric public service delivery in Bojonegoro Regency, Indonesia,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2442538.
S. Z. A. Shah, M. Ahmad, and F. Mahmood, “Heuristic biases in investment decision-making and perceived market efficiency: A survey at the Pakistan stock exchange,” Qual. Res. Financ. …, 2018, doi: 10.1108/qrfm-04-2017-0033.
A. Ahmad, S. N. Azis, and M. Z. Murfat, “Beyond the Badge: The Determinants of Indonesian Public-Servant Performance,” J. Minds, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2024, doi: 10.24252/minds.v11i1.45228.
R. Najmy, H. Malau, R. Najmy, and H. Malau, “Effectiveness of the policy on converting structural positions to functional positions at the Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) Of Padang City,” Priviet Soc. Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 95–104, 2025, doi: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.977.
Mardiasmo, Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2018.
M. Mahsun, Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia: Universitas Terbuka, 2019.
T. W. Schultz, “Investment in Human Capital,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1961.
G. S. Becker, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York, NY, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1964.
J. Fitz-enz, The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance. New York, NY, USA: AMACOM, 2000.
E. M. Berman, J. S. Bowman, J. P. West, and M. R. Van Wart, Human Resource Management in Public Service: Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press, 2019.
Sedarmayanti, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2017.
L. M. Spencer and S. M. Spencer, Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
S. P. Robbins and T. A. Judge, Organizational Behavior. Harlow, UK: Pearson, 2019.
E. H. Schein and P. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2017.
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
