REVIEW OF TYPES OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY (FINTECH) IN INDONESIA: UNDERSTANDING SERVICES AND THEIR IMPACT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61167/mnk.v2i3.219

Keywords:

Financial Technology (Fintech), Financial Inclusion, Digital Wallet, Peer-to-Peer Lending, Crowdfunding

Abstract

This study aims to identify the various types of financial technology (fintech) operating in Indonesia and analyze their impact on financial inclusion. Utilizing literature review and secondary data analysis from reputable sources, the research reveals that a diverse range of fintech, including digital wallets, peer-to-peer lending, crowdfunding, digital banks, and market aggregators, has seen significant growth in Indonesia. Each fintech type offers unique services that enhance the accessibility of financial services for the public, particularly for underserved segments of the population. The findings indicate that digital wallets have become a popular choice for daily transactions, facilitating payments and enhancing user convenience. Peer-to-peer lending platforms provide crucial financing options for individuals and small businesses who may struggle to access traditional bank loans. Crowdfunding enables entrepreneurs to raise capital from a wide audience, fostering innovation and community support. Moreover, the study highlights the varying business models within the fintech landscape, which include transaction fees, interest income from loans, and partnerships with merchants. These models illustrate the adaptability of fintech solutions in responding to the evolving needs of consumers. By shedding light on the dynamics of the fintech industry and its role in promoting financial inclusion, this research contributes valuable insights for stakeholders, including policymakers, industry players, and consumers. The study underscores the importance of fostering a supportive regulatory framework to ensure sustainable growth and responsible innovation in the fintech sector in Indonesia.

References

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008

Philippon, T. (2016). The FinTech Opportunity. NBER Working Paper No. 22476. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w22476

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. doi:10.2307/41410412

World Bank. (2014). Global Financial Development Report 2014: Financial Inclusion. World Bank Publications. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16238

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2023). Laporan Statistik Fintech. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id

Kitabisa. (2023). Tentang Kami. Retrieved from https://kitabisa.com

GandengTangan. (2023). Platform Crowdfunding untuk Usaha Mikro dan Kecil. Retrieved from https://gandengtangan.org

Jenius. (2023). Inovasi Perbankan Digital di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.jenius.com

GoPay. (2023). Layanan Pembayaran Digital yang Mudah dan Aman. Retrieved from https://gopay.co.id

Kredivo. (2023). Pinjaman Online yang Mudah dan Cepat. Retrieved from https://kredivo.com

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Mardiana, & Muhammad Fauzan. (2024). REVIEW OF TYPES OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY (FINTECH) IN INDONESIA: UNDERSTANDING SERVICES AND THEIR IMPACT. MANKEU (JURNAL MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN), 2(3), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.61167/mnk.v2i3.219